Accusing your political rival of crimes but never prosecuting them, implies something very profound. Either you're lying, which should disqualify you or you or someone in your political party is guilty of the same thing. I wonder how many (if any) of the current Democratic or Republican voters consider this fact.
In the real world, when someone is accused of a crime (sometimes felonies) they are usually investigated, indicted and sometimes convicted. In politics today, this is such a rarity that politicians no longer hide some of their most egregious, immoral acts. And, in some cases, they have legalized what is illegal for everyone else. Just listen to Nancy Pelosi condone Insider trading. In this instance, a reasonable and good follow up question would have been to ask...
"If Congress should be allowed to conduct insider trades, because we're a free market economy then why shouldn't everyone be allowed to conduct insider trades?
And this question should be followed up with the following...
"If insider trading shouldn't be allowed for everyone in this free market economy then why should it be legal for Congress people?
In 2018, I wrote a book highlighting the problems Humanity would face if more power, wealth, and control was funneled to a small group of elite individuals, groups, or organizations. In my book, I provided solutions (from myself and others) to the inevitable problems and also a means for the Public to analyze, compare, and contrast the words and deeds of those we choose to follow against reality. In my book Solutions: Enough complaining. Let's fix America.
In "Solutions...", I provide the means for readers to disseminate information as provided by their news sources of choice, their elected officials, and any other authority they choose to follow. The book also offers a means to hold their leaders up, not just to a higher standard than is currently accepted but to one that would improve their lives and the lives of those for whom they care.
Opmerkingen